🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy was effective, and revealed recent overtures had come from intermediaries to restart discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, Western states employed their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in various formats if discussions resume.

The US president last week said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the European states that had always sought to dictate their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the ultimate answer to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained many lessons from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the wake of this invasion."